Supply Chain Network Design: The Pathway to Integrating Strategy, Models, and Execution

Successful companies are often able to establish a clear transmission mechanism that links business strategy to the supply chain network. Interestingly, the supply chain network not only aligns with business strategy, but can also create new strategic opportunities. Companies that adopt a strategy-driven approach in network design often have significantly higher supply chain innovation capabilities than their peers. For example, Amazon's "next-day delivery" service is a competitive advantage that emerged from its unique network layout capabilities.

In practice, successful supply chain network design typically requires alignment with business strategy across three dimensions:

1. Market Response Dimension: The network structure must match the company's market strategy and customer service commitments. For example, fast fashion brand ZARA’s rapid response supply network is a direct reflection of its quick market response strategy.

2. Cost Structure Dimension: Network efficiency needs to support the company’s overall cost strategy. Walmart’s cross-docking logistics network, where each hub typically serves 75 to 100 stores within a 250-mile radius, is an example of how a cost-leadership strategy is translated into specific network design principles.

3. Resilience and Sustainability Dimension: The network layout should support the company’s flexibility in responding to market and environmental changes, assess supply chain risks, and ensure the sustainability of the business.

As the business environment continues to evolve, companies face unprecedented challenges. According to Gartner’s forecast, by 2025, more than 60% of companies will need to redefine the relationship between their supply chain network and business strategy. This shift brings forth a new consideration: how to build a network structure that not only supports the current business strategy but also possesses the adaptability needed for the future.

"In supply chain network design, using the wrong approach is often more dangerous than not conducting any analysis at all." In fact, according to recent studies, companies that rely on professional models to optimize and simulate their networks are 3.7 times more likely to achieve benefits than those that do not.

Traditional network design methods often overly rely on the physical centroid principle. This method tries to determine the location of facilities by finding the geometric center of demand points. It may appear scientific, but it has significant flaws. A typical example is when a country, in planning its capital, used the population centroid method to determine the theoretically optimal location, which turned out to be in the sea. This extreme example vividly illustrates that simple mathematical models cannot fully meet the complex needs of reality.

Modern supply chain network design has evolved to incorporate a more comprehensive algorithmic model. This framework not only focuses on mathematical optimization but also emphasizes integrating business strategy, operational constraints, and implementation feasibility into the decision-making process.

In practice, this model framework demonstrates significant advantages. For example, a global manufacturing company, when planning its North American distribution network, did not simply seek to minimize transportation costs. Instead, they created a multi-dimensional optimization goal that included service levels, network resilience, and future growth potential. Through this approach, they not only identified the optimal network configuration but, more importantly, discovered several key strategic opportunities.

However, the advancement of models has also brought new challenges. The most prominent issue is how to balance certainty and flexibility. Overemphasis on certainty can lead to rigid network structures, while excessive pursuit of flexibility may result in high complexity and costs. The key to solving this dilemma lies in having the ability for scenario planning and sensitivity analysis.

Successful network design requires going beyond simple binary decision-making and constructing a multi-layered scenario analysis framework. This framework should consider three dimensions: the baseline scenario (reflecting current realities), the adjusted baseline (including known changes), and the strategic scenario (exploring potential futures).

A noteworthy case comes from the retail industry. Faced with the impact of e-commerce, a traditional retailer needed to redesign its distribution network to support an omnichannel strategy. What makes this case particularly interesting is that they adopted a "scenario-driven" design approach.

Specifically, they established three key scenarios: the baseline scenario (continuation of current trends), the accelerated scenario (rapid growth of e-commerce), and the hybrid scenario (deep integration of online and offline channels). By comparing network performance across these scenarios, they found that the traditional store-centric network structure was no longer suitable for future development, but completely shifting to an e-commerce distribution model was not the optimal choice. Ultimately, they designed a "hierarchical" network: large regional distribution centers handling mainstream products, city distribution centers meeting rapid response needs, and transforming some large stores into localized distribution nodes. This solution maintained network efficiency while providing enough flexibility to address future uncertainties.

Effective network design needs to consider both constrained and unconstrained optimization. Constrained optimization takes into account real-world limitations, such as facility capacity and service level requirements, while unconstrained optimization helps uncover hidden opportunities. For example, when temporarily lifting certain constraints, innovative network configuration solutions may emerge.

"A perfect model does not exist, but an effective decision-making process can be achieved." Over the past two years, we have observed a significant trend: companies that have been successful in network design often do not use the most complex models, but are the best at translating theory into actionable solutions.

In the practice of network design, the most challenging aspect is often not building the model, but acquiring and validating the data. According to Gartner's research, 43% of companies failed to achieve the expected benefits from network transformation projects, with a large portion of the issue attributed to data quality problems. This phenomenon raises an important question: why, in today’s highly digitized world, is data still such a tricky issue?

The root cause often lies in our overly simplistic understanding of data. Companies need to establish a "benchmark data model," which is not just about collecting historical data, but more importantly, understanding the business logic behind the data. For example, a global retailer planning its Asia-Pacific distribution network found that the delivery patterns in their historical data were severely misaligned with actual operational conditions. Further investigation revealed that this discrepancy stemmed from insufficient consideration of seasonal fluctuations and special promotional events.

However, even with reliable data, the success of a network design project still depends on an effective execution management system. "The best network design may falter at the last mile." Indeed, according to our research, up to 40% of network design projects fail to fully achieve their expected goals, and most of these failures do not stem from technical issues, but from breakdowns in the execution and management phases.

In supply chain network design, technical analysis is only half the battle; the more challenging aspect is stakeholder management. A typical case is a global network optimization project for a consumer goods company: their analysis team proposed a solution that could save 15% in operational costs, but the project stalled during the implementation phase. Further investigation revealed that the issue was due to the failure to effectively address the concerns and resistance of regional distributors.

This case reveals a key insight: network design is not just an analytical process, but a change management challenge. Successful projects often adopt a strategy of "early involvement and continuous engagement." For example, involving key stakeholders during the data collection phase not only improves data quality but, more importantly, helps cultivate a sense of ownership in the project.

Supply chain network design is also not a one-time static decision but an ongoing optimization process. According to Gartner's latest survey, companies that have established regular network evaluation mechanisms see significantly better supply chain performance compared to their peers.

===========

This article is reproduced from the WeChat public account "Wendao - Supply Chain Thinking," and represents only the views of the author. If you have any suggestions or questions, please feel free to contact me.

"Wendao - Supply Chain Thinking" is positioned as a platform for gathering top domestic digital and supply chain experts to discuss professional issues and frontier topics in the broader supply chain field, and to explore the development direction of supply chains in the digital domain.

END